After the harrowing events at The Old Castle in 1843, Mary Ann Worthington found herself in a precarious position. Her husband, Thomas, had perished in a tragic fire, and though the inquest ruled his death an accident, the turmoil that followed left Mary Ann in financial and social uncertainty. But among the witnesses at the inquest was someone who would soon play a new and surprising role in her life—17-year-old Albert Milsted.
Albert Milsted: The Young Assistant
Albert had been working at The Old Castle, assisting Mary Ann and Thomas in running the tavern. Although his father, Robert Milsted, was a hatter, Albert had not followed in his footsteps. Instead, he found employment in the world of public houses, possibly drawn by the opportunities they presented for steady work and a degree of social mobility.
His exact relationship with the Worthington family before the fire remains somewhat unclear, but the inquest records show that Albert was trusted with responsibilities at the tavern. On the night of the fire, he and Frederick Worthington had gone out together, leaving the household in the hands of Mary Ann and the staff.
“At 20 minutes before 12 o’clock my son and Albert, a young man who conducts the business, asked leave to go to the Castle and Ball, to hear a young man sing.”
— Bristol Mercury, 16 September 1843
Albert’s presence at court following the tragedy suggests he had a significant role in the household, enough to be questioned as part of the inquiry. But what happened next was even more unexpected.
A Scandalous Match? The Marriage of Albert and Mary Ann
A year after the fire, on 4 December 1844, Albert Milsted, now just 18, married Mary Ann Worthington, a widow 14 years his senior, at St Andrew’s Church, Clifton. The banns had been read in the preceding weeks, suggesting the marriage was not a hasty decision. But what prompted it?
There are several possibilities:
- A Matter of Practicality: Albert had already been working with Mary Ann in the pub business, and she needed a business partner. Marrying him may have secured her position and allowed them to continue running an establishment together.
- A Personal Connection: Despite the age difference, it’s possible that Albert and Mary Ann formed an attachment during the months following the fire. With her husband gone, Albert may have stepped into a greater role in her life.
- A Strategic Move: Given that women in the 19th century had limited rights to property and business ownership, marrying Albert may have provided Mary Ann with legal protection and stability.
Their wedding certificate records Elizabeth Milsted and Frederick Worthington as witnesses, suggesting the match was not entirely opposed by their families. Albert’s profession on the certificate is difficult to read but may indicate he was still working as a victualler—perhaps he and Mary Ann had continued in the trade.

A Short-Lived Union
By the time of the 1851 Census, the marriage had effectively ended. Mary Ann was living on Temple Street, Bristol, running a boarding house with her son Frederick. But instead of listing herself as married, she reverted to calling herself a widow—despite Albert being very much alive.
Curiously, Albert does not appear in the 1851 Census with Mary. His absence from this specific document does not mean he vanished from history—far from it. Albert’s later life can still be traced, and his story did not end with his short-lived marriage to Mary Ann. Unlike many Victorian men who abandoned wives in an era when divorce was nearly impossible, Albert’s movements can still be followed in historical records.
Why Did Albert and Mary Ann Go Their Separate Ways?
Albert did not disappear—but his marriage to Mary Ann was short-lived. What caused them to part ways? Did he leave, or did she? Was their union simply one of convenience, or did something deeper go wrong?
In my next post, I’ll explore the social context of their story, how Victorian views on marriage and bigamy may have shaped their decisions, and what we can learn from their lives today.
Leave a comment